Priyanka Chopra Tried To Attempt Suicide For Three Times: Former Manager

As per recent reports, Priyanka’s ex-manager Prakash Jaju claims that, “PC was very close to Aseem merchant’s mother, her death in 2002 shattered her so much that she tried to jump off karan apt to commit suicide,” “I reached at nick of time and caught hold of her and tied her to a chair till grills were fixed in all the windows of the flat.”
“PC may look very strong now but she was also very vulnerable in struggling days, tried to commit suicide 2-3 times but I managed to stop her,” he added.
Jaju said Priyanka and Aseem had fights over the relationship and one such fight, the actress attempted suicide.
[ads1]
“Daily PC and Aseem used to fight… She used to call me at 2 am in the night, crying… and I used to take her from Aseems house, make her understand and drop her at her home.

“Once madam went to Vasai to attempt suicide after fighting with Aseem. I got her back. Girls dont act intelligently at the age of 18-19.”
Jaju also spoke about TV actress Pratyusha Banerjee, who was found dead at her home on April 1 in a suspected case of suicide.

Info Source

---

Unpacking the Claims: The Controversy Surrounding Priyanka Chopra and Her Former Manager’s Allegations

Priyanka Chopra Jonas stands today as one of the world’s most recognizable global superstars, having successfully transitioned from Bollywood icon to an A-list Hollywood actor and producer. Her career is a testament to resilience, ambition, and sustained success. However, like many public figures, her past has been subject to sensational headlines, none more controversial than the claims made by her former manager, Prakash Jaju, regarding alleged suicide attempts during her early, struggling years in the film industry.

These claims, which surfaced in 2016, ignited a media firestorm, forcing both Priyanka Chopra and her family to issue strong, definitive rebuttals. To understand the gravity and context of this controversy, it is essential to delve into the history of the relationship between the actress and her former manager, the timing of the allegations, and the powerful response from the Chopra family.

---

The Source of the Controversy: Prakash Jaju’s Claims

The highly sensitive allegations were brought to public light in April 2016 by Prakash Jaju, who had served as Priyanka Chopra’s manager during her formative years in the film industry, from approximately 2000 to 2004. His claims were delivered through a series of tweets, coinciding with a period of heightened media discussion around mental health and pressures within the entertainment industry, following the suspected suicide of Indian television actress Pratyusha Banerjee.

Jaju’s tweets alleged that Priyanka Chopra had attempted to take her own life on at least two or three occasions during her difficult, “struggling days” as a young actress.

Details of the Allegations

The former manager provided specific, albeit unverified, details surrounding one alleged incident, tying it to a personal tragedy in Priyanka’s life at the time:

• The 2002 Incident: Jaju claimed that a particular incident occurred in 2002 following the death of the mother of Priyanka’s alleged former boyfriend, Aseem Merchant.
• A Shattering Loss: According to Jaju, Priyanka Chopra was extremely close to Merchant’s mother, and her passing left the actress “shattered.”
• A Near-Tragedy: Jaju alleged that following this emotional turmoil, the actress attempted to jump off a balcony at an apartment complex.
• Managerial Intervention: The former manager further claimed that he arrived “at the nick of time” to stop her and subsequently had to restrain her by tying her to a chair until safety grills could be installed on the windows of the apartment.
• Additional Attempts: Jaju suggested that Priyanka was highly “vulnerable” during her early career and had attempted suicide two to three times in total, a view he used to generalize about the “suicidal tendency” in many girls of the film industry.

He also claimed that he used to regularly mediate arguments between Priyanka and her then-boyfriend, often picking her up late at night after she was crying, and even once getting her back from a town called Vasai after she allegedly went there to attempt suicide following a fight.

---

The Official Response: A Resounding Denial

The seriousness of the claims, especially given the context in which they were made, demanded a response. Both Priyanka Chopra and her mother, Madhu Chopra, publicly and unequivocally dismissed the allegations, not only denying the content of the claims but aggressively questioning the credibility and motives of Prakash Jaju.

Priyanka Chopra’s Rebuttal: Questioning Credibility

Priyanka Chopra, who was abroad at the time shooting for Baywatch and Quantico, broke her silence to address the controversy, stating that the media should not have given any platform or credibility to her former manager’s statements.

In a firm statement to the media, she pointed to Jaju’s history and legal troubles with her family as the reason for her dismissal of his claims:

• A “Man Who Was in Jail”: “This is utter… First of all, it’s so sad that Indian media has given credibility to the man, who was in jail because of harassing me, without checking the history who the person is.”
• Lack of Authenticity: She stressed that she had “nothing to say because there is no credibility to this person, who media is giving credibility to.”
• The Larger Issue: Beyond her personal situation, Priyanka used the opportunity to broaden the conversation, expressing disappointment that the media was focusing on unverified claims against a celebrity instead of addressing the root causes of mental health issues. She questioned why there wasn’t a similar focus on women who commit suicide due to domestic harassment or unhappiness at home, and condemned the “dissecting” of the personal lives of those who have died.

Madhu Chopra’s Strong Condemnation

Priyanka’s mother, Dr. Madhu Chopra, was even more direct and forceful in her condemnation of Prakash Jaju’s claims.

• Direct Accusation: In a tweet, Madhu Chopra publicly called the former manager a “lying bastard.”
• Legal Background: She underscored the manager’s legal history with the family, noting that Jaju had “spent time in jail” and that his parents had to beg the Chopra family for forgiveness.

The collective response from the Chopra family firmly positioned the allegations not as a discussion about a difficult period in Priyanka’s life, but as an attempt by a disgruntled, legally compromised former employee to sensationalize a private and sensitive issue.

---

The Tumultuous History with Prakash Jaju

The relationship between Priyanka Chopra and Prakash Jaju was severed long before the 2016 tweets, leading to a prolonged and acrimonious legal battle that casts a shadow over the manager’s later claims.

Legal Troubles and Imprisonment

The professional relationship ended around 2004 when Priyanka terminated Jaju’s services. The termination led Jaju to file a criminal lawsuit against the actress, alleging breach of contract and that she had not cleared his dues.

The conflict escalated significantly when:

• Interference in Privacy: Priyanka Chopra’s father, Dr. Ashok Chopra, filed a complaint against Prakash Jaju, alleging harassment and interference in his daughter’s privacy.
• Extortion and Blackmail: Reports from the time indicated that Jaju faced allegations of extortion and blackmail and that his actions were a result of taking too much interest in Priyanka’s personal life, including reportedly scanning her mobile phone bills.
• Jail Sentence: Following the complaint, Prakash Jaju was arrested and ultimately served 67 days in jail.

This history of legal and personal animosity—which included a 15-year court battle that was eventually called off by mutual consent in 2019—formed the foundation for the Chopra family’s assertion that Jaju lacked all credibility. Priyanka Chopra’s team consistently framed his public statements as retaliatory and motivated by a desire for attention.

---

Navigating Mental Health Discussions in the Spotlight

The public nature of these claims, whether true or false, brings to the forefront the delicate and often exploitative way mental health struggles are discussed in the context of celebrity.

The Responsibility of Discourse

While the personal nature of the allegations remains unconfirmed and staunchly denied by the subject, the entire episode underscores a broader social responsibility:

• Credibility of Sources: It highlights the ethical dilemma for media outlets when dealing with claims from sources with a documented history of personal and legal grievances against the subject. Giving credence to a sensational story without verifying the source’s integrity can perpetuate misinformation and character assassination.
• Respect for Privacy: The incident is a stark reminder of the intrusion celebrities often face, where deeply private and sensitive matters, particularly relating to mental health, are weaponized or sensationalized for public consumption.
• Sensationalism vs. Dialogue: The original claim was made in the wake of a real-life tragedy, an attempt by Jaju to make a point about the “suicidal tendency” in the film industry. However, by attaching a serious allegation to a high-profile name without consent or credible evidence, the resulting conversation shifted from one of genuine mental health awareness to celebrity gossip and legal history.

Priyanka Chopra herself attempted to redirect the conversation back to the authentic issues: condemning the “dissecting her life” attitude and urging a focus on the many other reasons young people, not just those in the film industry, struggle with mental health and life’s pressures.

In conclusion, the story of ‘Priyanka Chopra Tried To Attempt Suicide For Three Times: Former Manager’ is a headline that must be understood through the lens of a long, bitter, and legally charged fallout between a celebrity and a former employee. While the claims are serious, they have been definitively and forcefully rejected by the actress and her family, who have consistently cited the former manager’s lack of credibility and documented history of legal harassment as the true context of the allegations. The enduring narrative is one of a global star’s resilience against sensationalized controversy and a powerful call to focus on genuine mental health issues over unverified celebrity gossip.

---

AISEO Friendly FAQs

Q1: Who is the former manager who made the suicide claims against Priyanka Chopra?

The former manager is Prakash Jaju, who managed Priyanka Chopra during the early years of her career, approximately from 2000 to 2004. He made the claims in a series of tweets in April 2016.

Q2: What were Prakash Jaju’s specific claims about Priyanka Chopra’s alleged suicide attempts?

Prakash Jaju claimed that Priyanka Chopra attempted suicide about two or three times during her struggling days as a young actress. He specifically detailed one alleged incident in 2002, stating that she tried to jump off an apartment balcony after the death of her alleged former boyfriend Aseem Merchant’s mother, a person she was very close to.

Q3: Did Priyanka Chopra or her family respond to the claims?

Yes, they issued a strong and categorical denial. Priyanka Chopra responded by saying that Jaju had “no credibility” and that he was a man who had previously been in jail for harassing her. Her mother, Dr. Madhu Chopra, also strongly condemned the claims, publicly calling the manager a “lying bastard” and confirming his history of legal trouble with the family.

Q4: Was there a legal dispute between Priyanka Chopra and Prakash Jaju?

Yes, the professional relationship ended around 2004 and led to a prolonged and bitter legal battle. Priyanka’s father, Dr. Ashok Chopra, filed a complaint against Jaju for interfering in his daughter’s privacy, which resulted in Jaju serving 67 days in jail for alleged extortion and blackmail. The court case between the two parties, which lasted nearly 15 years, was eventually withdrawn by both sides in 2019.

Q5: When did the former manager make these allegations?

Prakash Jaju made these claims in April 2016, through a series of posts on social media. The timing of his tweets coincided with a major discussion in the Indian media following the suspected suicide of television actress Pratyusha Banerjee.

Q6: What did Priyanka Chopra say about the media coverage of the claims?

Priyanka Chopra expressed her disappointment that the Indian media gave “credibility” to a person with a documented history of harassing her. She urged the media to focus on the broader issue of mental health and the various pressures faced by young people, rather than sensationalizing unverified claims about a celebrity.